The Art of Enough: Why Minimalism Matters in Software Engineering
Software gets slower faster than hardware gets faster. Exploring Wirth's Law and why real progress might not be about adding more, but mastering the art of enough.
I was reflecting on how often we "simplify" things in tech, only to end up with something even more complex. A recent conversation about Kubernetes and React made me realize how often our good intentions lead us toward maximalism in the name of progress. We look around and realize our new tools are heavier, slower, and more complex than ever. Maybe it's not the tools that changed, but our tendency to chase maximalism in the name of progress.
Wirth's Law: A Warning From 1995
In 1995, computer scientist Niklaus Wirth warned us in A Plea for Lean Software. His insight, now known as Wirth's Law, was simple and devastating:
Software gets slower faster than hardware gets faster.
He was describing what happens when we equate more features with more value. The faster our machines get, the more bloat we add on top.
You Can See It Everywhere
- We reach for Kubernetes to deploy a single service
- We spin up React for a static web page
- We over-engineer because big tools feel like progress
But innovation often swings like a pendulum. After each wave of maximalism, there's a moment when we rediscover restraint.
The Case for Working With the Platform
Carson Gross, the developer behind HTMX, captures this perfectly:
I might encourage minimalism in web development, but only because there's this incredibly complicated piece of software called a browser. We can take advantage of that complexity rather than putting a lot of complexity on top of it.
I've been exploring this philosophy firsthand by learning HTMX as an alternative to the complexities of React and other JavaScript frameworks. What started as curiosity about a simpler approach led me to discover Carson Gross's compelling rationale: why add layers of abstraction when the browser itself is already a powerful, battle-tested platform? HTMX leverages what HTML and browsers do best: handling hypermedia, rather than rebuilding these capabilities in JavaScript or TypeScript. It's been refreshing to see how much we can accomplish by working with the platform instead of on top of it.
That's the mindset shift. Minimalism is not about doing less. It's about using what already exists more intelligently.
The Challenge
- When you design or build, ask if your problem really needs the full machinery
- Choose maximalism only when scale demands it
- Choose minimalism when clarity and speed matter more
Wirth's Law reminds us that unchecked growth creates drag. Gross's philosophy reminds us that simplicity can be strategic.
✨ Real progress might not be about adding more at all. It might be about mastering the art of enough.
Originally shared on LinkedIn
Share this post
Written by Vinny Carpenter
VP Engineering · 30+ Team Experience
I lead engineering teams building cloud-native platforms at a Fortune 100 company. I write about engineering leadership, AI-assisted development, platform strategy, and the hard lessons that come from shipping at scale.
Related Posts
The Agentic SDLC: Uniting the AI Tool Sprawl
Every tool in your product development life cycle is now an AI agent trying to do everything. Here is how to stop the chaos, draw the right boundaries, and build an orchestrated pipeline that actually works.
Eleven Years, One Week, and an AI Co-Pilot: Rebuilding TravelTimes for iOS 26.4
A decade-old side project, six major features, one week. How spec-driven AI-assisted development compressed months of work into a focused sprint on a real codebase with real constraints — and where the AI got it wrong.
They're Using Claude to Ship Claude (And It Shows)
Anthropic has shipped more meaningful product features in the last few weeks than most teams ship in a quarter. A theory — and what it tells us about what AI-assisted development actually unlocks when a team uses their own product to build it.